Canadians Want Digital Health Investment. Now is the Time for Hospitals to Deliver.

healthcare-technology
healthcare-technology

Canadians Want Digital Health Investment. Now is the Time for Hospitals to Deliver.

Many Canadians are deeply proud of our country’s healthcare system and consider it part of the Canadian identity. However, it’s also commonly acknowledged that more work needs to be done to increase health equity, provide better patient experiences and deliver improved health outcomes.

In A Healthy Dialogue, the latest report from Canada Health Infoway, research revealed that Canadians have a strong appetite to leverage digital health technology as a way of responding to these gaps and strengthening our healthcare experience.

In other parts of life, digital technology has transformed the way we live and interact—from how we bank, to how we travel, to how we enjoy entertainment. It’s now time to bring the same convenience, flexibility and experience improvements into Canadian hospitals as we work together to build a modern healthcare system.

A Growing Demand

Compared to peer countries, Canada has been slow to embrace digital health technology. But this isn’t because Canadians aren’t ready to embrace new tools and approaches.

A Healthy Dialogue is the result of an extensive consultation conducted by Canada Health Infoway in 2019-2020. The consultation reached 58,000 Canadians and covered topics including their current use of technology, the benefits they anticipated from using healthcare technology, the barriers they faced in adopting new technologies and their concerns around privacy and security. Given the timing of the project, researchers also adapted it to include questions about the impact of COVID-19 on Canadians’ readiness for digital health investment.

The results of the consultation are overwhelmingly clear: Canadians want digital health investment.

In fact, A Healthy Dialogue found that:

  • 90% of Canadians want technology that puts them in greater control of their health. They also want to learn how technology can help them work towards better health outcomes.
  • 92% of Canadians want technology that makes healthcare as convenient as other aspects of their lives.
  • 84% of Canadians say they would use technology tools to help manage their health.
  • 80% of Canadians believe investing in health care technology should be a top government priority.

Current Barriers for Hospitals

Although the demand is clear, it’s not always easy for hospitals to quickly adopt new health technology. In fact, A Healthy Dialogue identifies three categories of barriers that exist, creating challenges for transformation. These barriers are felt by patients, providers and administrators in a variety of ways. In all cases, overcoming them presents powerful opportunities for strengthening the Canadian healthcare system.

1) Systemic barriers

Systemic barriers are those that are faced by “underserved” people in Canada’s healthcare system. This predominantly includes low-income Canadians, those living in rural or remote areas and people who are newcomers to Canada. Prejudice and bias in accessing healthcare can also limit people from accessing digital health tools.

For hospitals working with underserved communities, this can translate into systemic barriers that make it difficult to gain buy-in from patients. Where systemic discrimination has long impacted a community’s experience of accessing healthcare, it may be necessary to rebuild trust and confidence in order to address fears.

More broadly, hospitals face systemic barriers of their own, including policy barriers, procurement challenges, regulatory constraints, and funding issues. The complexity of navigating these challenges can lead to innovation stalling.

2) Technical barriers

Technical barriers for patients might include issues around personal confidence (for example, not knowing what apps to use or lack of confidence in using technology) as well as barriers such as inadequate access to reliable internet.

For hospitals, patients’ discomfort with technology can create difficulties or poor uptake. Problems can also develop in the deployment and use of technology in hospitals. In a separate report, Canada Health Infoway surveyed Canadian nurses about their use of digital health technology to look at benefits and barriers. Technical barriers include:

  • Use of multiple systems (e.g., both paper charts and electronic records)
  • Lack of integration between systems
  • Lack of available equipment
  • Inadequate training
  • Unreliable network connections

These issues need to be addressed in order to gain the full benefits of new technologies and to avoid creating system redundancies.

3) Privacy concerns

Concerns around privacy are one of the main barriers preventing Canadians from embracing digital health technology, despite comprehensive privacy laws at both the federal and provincial levels. Even when the pandemic meant that millions of Canadians experienced virtual care for perhaps the first time, 74% still identified privacy as a major concern.

A key concern is a potential for data breaches that might compromise health information, such as the LifeLabs hack that occurred in 2019. Hospitals are faced with the challenge of ensuring adequate safeguards are in place to protect confidential data, and communicating to patients the steps they have taken to do so.

The Time for Change is Now

The pandemic has shifted norms when it comes to digital health. Seven in 10 Canadians who sought medical assistance during the pandemic accessed virtual care, and 91% of people who received virtual care were satisfied with the experience. In hospitals, limitations on in-person visits meant that technology provided a necessary way for patients to stay connected to love ones under difficult circumstances.

The pandemic created rapid shifts in how hospitals and healthcare providers deliver care. And while these changes came from necessity, there is now the opportunity to build on this experience and design a digitally-enabled healthcare system for the future. By continuing efforts to overcome barriers, focus on the patient experience and increase patients’ empowerment in their own care, we can improve clinical outcomes and reduce clinicians’ workloads, and enhance Canada’s legacy of excellence in healthcare.

How HealthHub is Helping

At HealthHub, we’ve seen firsthand that health technology has the capability to enhance our healthcare system and the lives of Canadians. As a leading Canadian provider of bedside digital patient engagement solutions, we support a vision of a healthcare system that puts the patient experience at the center in order to improve health outcomes.

Our health tech solution, called myHealthHub, aims to overcome systemic, technical and privacy barriers by providing hospitals with an accessible, scalable and secure patient engagement platform. We’re also committed to working with hospitals and healthcare providers to grow their digital health capacity in ways that are equitable so all Canadians can benefit.

Canadians want digital health investment. Let’s work together to help your hospital deliver.

Safe Kid Games

Safe Games for Kids - Patient Resource Page

Safe Kid Games

Safe online games for kids filled with the best educational games, learning games, and just plain fun games. Every game here is free and is reviewed to ensure it’s safe for children.

Creating “Engagement-Capable Environments” in Healthcare

calendar icon
calendar icon

Creating “Engagement-Capable Environments” in Healthcare

Carol Fancott, Christine Maika, G. Ross Baker, Maria Judd

Patient Engagement – Catalyzing Improvement and Innovation in Healthcare December 2016 : 11-34

Introduction
Creating “Engagement-Capable Environments” in Healthcare
G. Ross Baker, Maria Judd, Carol Fancott and Christine Maika

Chapter 1 | Case Study
McGill University Health Centre
Patricia O’Connor, Alain Biron, Brenda MacGibbon and Carol Fancott

Chapter 2 | Case Study
Kingston General Hospital
Maria Judd, Eleanor Rivoire and Christine Maika

Chapter 3 | Case Study
Augusta University Health System
Anu MacIntosh-Murray and Carol Fancott

Chapter 4 | Case Study
Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center
Maria Judd, Anu MacIntosh-Murray and G. Ross Baker

Chapter 5 | Case Study
Whittington Health Respiratory Service
Jocelyn Cornwell, Louise Restrick and G. Ross Baker

Chapter 6 | Case Study
Northumbria Healthcare Trust
Jocelyn Cornwell, Annie Laverty, Jean-Louis Denis and G. Ross Baker

Chapter 7 | Case Study
Patients as Partners
Christine Maika, Caryl Harper and Maria Judd

Chapter 8 | Case Study
Northumberland Community Partnership
Carol Fancott

Chapter 9 | Case Study
Collaborative Chronic Care Network (C3N)
Elina Farmanova, Maria Judd, Peter Margolis, Justin Vandergrift and Michael Seid

Chapter 10 | Case Study
Saskatchewan Health Quality Council and Saskatoon Health Region
Carol Fancott, Malori Keller and G. Ross Baker

Afterword
Patient Partnerships: Three Levels of Change
Vincent Dumez

Afterword
Improving Care with Those We Are Privileged to Serve: Not If but When and How
Jim Conway

Schedule your free demo today.

Study: How Patients Want to Communicate with Their Physician

calendar icon

Study: How Patients Want to Communicate with Their Physician

Cameron Graham

Technology Advice Blog, 2014

“Patient portals are one of the main emerging technologies in US healthcare. Portals allow physicians to interact with patients outside of visits, easily distribute test results, and implement online appointment scheduling. While doctors have experienced mixed results in trying to encourage patient engagement with such systems, patient portals are almost certain to become widespread.

Many EHRs now feature integrated patient portals, and practices need at least five percent of their patients this year to use such a site, in order to qualify for Meaningful Use Stage 2 incentives. This can be accomplished by getting patients to view, download, or transmit health information over a portal, or send an online message to their provider. Physician response to these requirements has been well documented, but little research has been conducted on how patients feel about such a significant shift in patient-doctor communication.

In an effort to learn more about how patients wish to communicate with their doctors, we surveyed a random sample of 430 patients who had seen their primary care physician within the last year.

Key Survey Results:
– Nearly 40 percent of patients are unsure if their primary care physician has a patient portal system. Less than half of patients (49.2 percent) report being shown a portal either during or outside of their visit.

– Over half of patients report that their physician did not follow-up with them after their appointment. Of practices that did follow-up, only 9.1 percent did so through a patient portal.

– Overall, patients report that the number one way they’d like to schedule appointments is over the phone. However, patients aged 18-24 prefer to use an online calendar.

– 42.7 percent of patients prefer to receive test results over the phone. Only 18.1 percent prefer email, and 14.1 percent prefer online messages.”

Schedule your free demo today.

Patients With Lower Activation Associated With Higher Costs; Delivery Systems Should Know Their Patients’ ‘Scores’

calendar icon
calendar icon

Patients With Lower Activation Associated With Higher Costs; Delivery Systems Should Know Their Patients’ ‘Scores’

Jessica Greene, Judith H. Hibbard, Valerie Overton

Health Affairs Journal

Patient activation is a term that describes the skills and confidence that equip patients to become actively engaged in their health care. Health care delivery systems are turning to patient activation as yet another tool to help them and their patients improve outcomes and influence costs. In this article we examine the relationship between patient activation levels and billed care costs. In an analysis of 33,163 patients of Fairview Health Services, a large health care delivery system in Minnesota, we found that patients with the lowest activation levels had predicted average costs that were 8 percent higher in the base year and 21 percent higher in the first half of the next year than the costs of patients with the highest activation levels, both significant differences. What’s more, patient activation was a significant predictor of cost even after adjustment for a commonly used “risk score” specifically designed to predict future costs. As health care delivery systems move toward assuming greater accountability for costs and outcomes for defined patient populations, knowing patients’ ability and willingness to manage their health will be a relevant piece of information integral to health care providers’ ability to improve outcomes and lower costs.

Schedule your free demo today.

A systematic review of evidence on the links between patient experience and clinical safety and effectiveness

calendar icon
calendar icon

A systematic review of evidence on the links between patient experience and clinical safety and effectiveness

Cathal Doyle, Derek Bell, Laura Lennox

BMJ Journals

Objective: To explore evidence on the links between patient experience and clinical safety and effectiveness outcomes. Design: Systematic review. Setting: A wide range of settings within primary and secondary care including hospitals and primary care centres. Participants: A wide range of demographic groups and age groups. Primary and secondary outcome measures: A broad range of patient safety and clinical effectiveness outcomes including mortality, physical symptoms, length of stay and adherence to treatment. Results: This study, summarising evidence from 55 studies, indicates consistent positive associations between patient experience, patient safety and clinical effectiveness for a wide range of disease areas, settings, outcome measures and study designs. It demonstrates positive associations between patient experience and self-rated and objectively measured health outcomes; adherence to recommended clinical practice and medication; preventive care (such as health-promoting behaviour, use of screening services and immunisation); and resource use (such as hospitalisation, length of stay and primary-care visits). There is some evidence of positive associations between patient experience and measures of the technical quality of care and adverse events. Overall, it was more common to find positive associations between patient experience and patient safety and clinical effectiveness than no associations. Conclusions The data presented display that patient experience is positively associated with clinical effectiveness and patient safety, and support the case for the inclusion of patient experience as one of the central pillars of quality in healthcare. It supports the argument that the three dimensions of quality should be looked at as a group and not in isolation. Clinicians should resist sidelining patient experience as too subjective or mood-oriented, divorced from the ‘real’ clinical work of measuring safety and effectiveness.

Schedule your free demo today.

Creating the Exceptional Patient Experience in One Academic Health System

calendar icon
calendar icon

Creating the Exceptional Patient Experience in One Academic Health System

A. Lorris Betz MD PhD, Brian Gresh MPA, Chrissy Daniels MS, Marilynn Paine MPH, Thomas Miller MD, Vivian S. Lee MD PhD MBA

Academic Medicine Journal March 2016 – Volume 91 – Issue 3 – p 338-344

Whether patient satisfaction scores can act as a catalyst for improving health care is highly debated. Some argue that pursuing patient satisfaction is overemphasized and potentially at odds with providing good care because it leads providers to overtest and overtreat patients and to bend to unreasonable patient demands, all to improve their ratings. Others cite studies showing that high patient satisfaction scores correlate with improved health outcomes. Ideally, assessing patient satisfaction metrics will encourage empathy, communication, trust, and shared decision making in the health care delivery process. From the patient’s perspective, sharing such metrics motivates physicians to provide patient-centered care and meets their need for easily accessible information about their providers. In this article, the authors describe a seven-year initiative, which began in 2008, to change the culture of the University of Utah Health Care system to deliver a consistently exceptional patient experience. Five factors affected the health system’s ability to provide such care: (1) a lack of good decision-making processes, (2) a lack of accountability, (3) the wrong attitude, (4) a lack of patient focus, and (5) mission conflict. Working groups designed initiatives at all levels of the health system to address these issues. What began as a patient satisfaction initiative evolved into a model for physician engagement, values-based employment practices, enhanced professionalism and communication, reduced variability in performance, and improved alignment of the mission and vision across hospital and faculty group practice teams.

Schedule your free demo today.

Patient Engagement: Four Case Studies That Highlight The Potential For Improved Health Outcomes And Reduced Costs

calendar icon
calendar icon

Patient Engagement: Four Case Studies That Highlight The Potential For Improved Health Outcomes And Reduced Costs

Ara Darzi, Hanan Al Kuwari, Jeremy Laurance, Mariam Matar, Peter J. Howitt, Sarah Henderson, Susan Edgman-Levitan

Health Affairs Journal Volume: 33 Issue: 9

The energy of patients and members of the public worldwide who care about improving health is a huge, but still largely unrecognized and untapped, resource. The aim of patient engagement is to shift the clinical paradigm from determining “what is the matter?” to discovering “what matters to you?” This article presents four case studies from around the world that highlight the proven and potential abilities of increased patient engagement to improve health outcomes and reduce costs, while extending the reach of treatment and diagnostic programs into the community. The cases are an online mental health community in the United Kingdom, a genetic screening program in the United Arab Emirates, a World Health Organization checklist for new mothers, and a hospital-based patient engagement initiative in the United States. Evidence from these and similar endeavors suggests that closer collaboration on the part of patients, families, health care providers, health care systems, and policy makers at multiple levels could help diverse nations provide more effective and population-appropriate health care with fewer resources.

Schedule your free demo today.